inp.polri.go.id - Jakarta. The police have never been selective in handling cases. Every time there is a case, the Police always follow it up seriously and professionally. In line with the Precision concept, the National Police (Polri) responds to every case that has the criminal potential to be dealt with quickly. But if there is a case where the process goes on for a long time, it is not because the police being selective or bias. Instead, investigators are in the process of searching for strong evidence. In addition to cases related to the Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) Law, expert testimony is a pillar of the legal construction. For this reason, Polri has prepared a virtual police, and they work gradually. Virtual police do not immediately send a warning letter to an account without verification. In addition, the virtual police will monitor activity on social media and will report to their leaders if they find a content that has the potential to violate ITE Law. Furthermore, the uploaded content submitted by officers will be asked for opinions from experts, such as criminal experts, linguists, and ITE experts. If there is a potential for a criminal act, the uploaded content will be submitted to the Director of Cyber Crime or a designated official. In addition, the National Police Chief (Kapolri) General Listyo Sigit Prabowo has issued a circular letter number SE/2/II/2021 concerning Ethical Cultural Awareness to Create a Clean, Healthy and Productive Indonesian Digital Space dated 19 February 2021. He provides several guidelines for handling cases relating to the ITE Law so that the law enforcement could provides a sense of justice for the community. Regarding the Holywing case and the Borobudur stupa meme case that resembles President Joko Widodo's face which Roy Suryo uploaded to his account, there is no impression that the Police are selective or picky about cases to be handled. Police investigators continue to act in line with the procedures for handling cases related to ITE violations, emphasizing community justice. When the two cases emerged, the public's reaction was different. It is perhaps what was caught by the public that the police investigators seemed to have a different attitude towards the two reports, even though this was not the case. Police investigators have acted with precision in handling the Holywings case, while the RS case followed later, because there were parties who first uploaded the content.